ARTICLE

EUROPEAN UNION AND LIBERALISM

04 Pages : 31-38

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/ger.2018(III-I).04      10.31703/ger.2018(III-I).04      Published : Jun 2018

European Union and Liberalism

    Complex interdependence is the crucial concept of liberalism. If Liberalism believes in democracy, cooperation, mutual benefits, and human rights, then complex interdependence helps the states to achieve these ideals. Moreover, it also minimizes the chances of conflict and war. The military’s role as a tool of foreign policy is limited, and transnational actors take precedence. The core of liberalism and interdependence could be understood more clearly if one applied it to the European Union. With 28 member states, the EU is the most influential intergovernmental organization in the whole world. The EU member states are mostly democratic and can easily be described as welfare states. The multiplex interdependence is a unique feature of the EU which makes it stronger. The EU has different organs which are responsible for drafting the legislature and carrying out different functions of the organization.

    Democracy, Complexinterdependence, Human rights, Cooperation, Mediation, Military Control
    (1) Sohail Ahmad
    Assistant Professor,, International Relations Programme,Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Inayat Kalim
    Assistant Professor, International Relations Programme, Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Azka Gull
    Candidate of MS,International Relations, Department of Humanities,COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Bell, D. (December 2014). What Is Liberalism?
  • Carmichael, C. P. (2013). Liberal Theory and the European Union.
  • Corner, M. (2014). The European Union: An Introduction. New York: I.B.Tauris & co.ltd.
  • Crescenzi, M. J. (1970). Economic Interdependence and Conflict in World Politics. Washington D.C: Rowman and Littlefield publishers, inc.
  • Gabel, M. J. (May 10, 2018). European Union. EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION.
  • Halpenin, S. (2004). war and the social change in the great Europe: the great transformation revisited. In S. Halperin. London: Cambridge university press.
  • Halperin, S. (2004). War and Social Change in Modern Europe: The Great Transformation Revisited. In S. Halperin, War and Social Change in Modern Europe: The Great Transformation Revisited. London: Cambridge university press.
  • Hubert Zimmermann, A. D. (2017). The European Union: Success or Failure?
  • Kochenov, A. J. (2017). The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States' compliance. new york: Oxford university press.
  • Marks, L. H. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Marry land, America: ROWAN AND LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS.
  • Minogue, H. K. (Mar 09, 2018). Liberalism
  • Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal theory Approach.
  • Never at War: Why Democracies Will Not Fight One Another. (1998). In S. R. Wear. Hartford: Yale university press.
  • Panchal, R. (12 January 2014). ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.
  • Parker, C. (23 March 2017). 6 things the EU has achieved, 60 years on from its founding treaty.
  • Pes, P. P. (2015). Microfinance, EU Structural Funds and Capacity Building for Managing Authorities: a comparative analysis of European convergence regions. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Ahmad, Sohail, Inayat Kalim, and Azka Gull. 2018. "European Union and Liberalism." Global Economics Review, III (I): 31-38 doi: 10.31703/ger.2018(III-I).04
    HARVARD : AHMAD, S., KALIM, I. & GULL, A. 2018. European Union and Liberalism. Global Economics Review, III, 31-38.
    MHRA : Ahmad, Sohail, Inayat Kalim, and Azka Gull. 2018. "European Union and Liberalism." Global Economics Review, III: 31-38
    MLA : Ahmad, Sohail, Inayat Kalim, and Azka Gull. "European Union and Liberalism." Global Economics Review, III.I (2018): 31-38 Print.
    OXFORD : Ahmad, Sohail, Kalim, Inayat, and Gull, Azka (2018), "European Union and Liberalism", Global Economics Review, III (I), 31-38