HRM Practices Enhancing Research Performance


Cite Us
Views (538)
Downloads (0)


Abstract

This paper surveys the writing on investigation PERFMNC by the attention over HR practices (PRCTICS). Deliberation is synchronized toward explicit associates that influence extraordinary investigation performance (PERFMNC) by establishments of progressive learning. Just before reply the investigation, query a comprehensive investigation of previous investigation considers is managed. This examination gives an explanation of explicit HR PRCTICS that influences particular study profitability as well as leads to discover greatness. HR PRCTICS are ordered keenly on the ability refining, motivation advancement as well as prospect–refining PRCTICS aimed at study focused effort. Outcomes reflect the mentions of previous investigations toward investigation elements of study PERFMNC in a perplexing besides secondary method also expose a specific plan of HR PERFMNC that authorize in the direction of transform specific qualities into PERFMNC. Establishments of advanced learning may use the findings sufficiently smearing HR workings at improving examination PERFMNC.                                           

 

Key Words

Investigation PERFMNC; HR PRCTICS; higher educational ozonisations; Academics; elements.

Introduction

The increasing interest in human resource management, (HRM) has caused a significant body of empirical research to emerge, examining the impact of different HRM Practices on organizational performance. However, minimum attention has been given to the conception or understanding of the specific mechanisms through which HRM practices influence performance. Despite the fact that this line of research plays a major role   to notice the importance of human resources, limited research has been conducted that can provide real insights for organizations wishing to gain a competitive advantage through people.

Reviewing the literature which examines the whole theoretical spectrum of HRM practices, one can notice that the researchers’ approaches seem to be more descriptive and confined within the limits of linking directly the HRM practices with performance. Most of them mainly, describe what HRM practices do and their impact on the performance (at various levels of the company). There is a limited amount of research which attempts to explore how HRM practices essentially work and, hence, to realize the processes through which these practices can lead to competitive advantage.

To upgrade study excellence, organizations of advanced learning need to respond to . accompanying significant inquiry: How to invigorate investigation movement and its efficiency between their specialists? . Thus, it requires compelling Human Resource Management (HR) PRCTICS that would upgrade investigation efficiency and permit to arrive at authoritative objectives. In spite of the fact that there is a great deal of studies committed to HR PRCTICS' effect on PERFMNC, there is still an absence of investigation dissecting explicit factors of individual study PERFMNC.

The goal of the investigation is to recognize explicit HR PRCTICS executed by (IHE) that impact particular study efficiency as well as lead to investigate excellence.

Scientists in HR investigated the connection among HR PRCTICS and organization PERFMNC (distinctive focus examinations): work PRCTICS and budgetary PERFMNCs (Huselid, 1995), dynamic HR PRCTICS (those influencing representative abilities, worker inspiration, besides the arrangement of effort) in addition to optimistic perceptual proportions of authoritative PERFMNC mental estimates points - connection between work atmospheres, HR PRCTICS and business PERFMNC connections among top supervisory group informal communities and organization PERFMNC industry attributes' impact on the degree of the connection among superior work frameworks and profitability vital HR sway on hierarchical PERFMNC, viable HR PRCTICS and positive connection on work PERFMNC (one college case, Tabiu and Nura, 2013).

Though, there is still an absence of investigation committed toward the upgrade of investigation efficiency of scholarly workforce, particularly recognizing besides exactly trying explicit HR PRCTICS. It is significant, that distinguishing aspects affecting excellent investigation is a pivotal issue, with respect to the previous quite a while study efficiency is the primary test for European IHE (just as a significant piece of workforce examination frameworks). It very well may be understood that European IHE today endeavour to place a stress on high quality study yield and to see a fitting framework as embraced to accomplish the primary objective of IHE – upgrade of high quality study. This thusly requires successful HR PRCTICS actualized through IHE that impact singular investigation profitability in addition lead to investigate superiority.

This investigation high points explicit HR PRCTICS that motivate investigation PERFMNC at IHE.

Overview of HRM-Performance Link

A significant body of research has suggested specific HRM practices that can improve employee motivation and commitment. As it is argued, these practices are expected to promote such inimitable attributes in human resources that can help an organization to obtain a competitive advantage and enhance its performance (Huselid, 1995; MacDuffie, 1995; Delaney and Huselid, 1996; Frits and MacDuffie, 1996; Guest, 1997; Hoque, 1999; Michie and Sheehan, 2001; Ahmad and Schroeder, 2002; Guest et al., 2003).

During the years, all these practices that lead to superior performance were given various names by different authors: “best HRM practices” (Pfeffer, 1994), high performance work systems or practices (Appelbaum and Batt, 1994; Appelbaum et al., 2000), high-involvement practices (Lawler, 1986), high commitment practices (Wood, 1996) and finally, higher productivity and product quality practices (Ichniowski et al., 1996). What is worth noting is. irrespective of the definition given to these HR practices, positive relation with competitive advantage is reported in most of the cases (Guest et al., 2003) In this paper the term best HRM practices will be preferred, referring to all those HRM practices and policies that have been identified as effective in improving performance.

The basic idea around best HRM practices is the particular set of those practices has the potential to bring. improved organizational performance for all organisations (Marchinton and Wilkinson, 2003), and therefore all firms should identify and implement best practice HRM in their effort to improve their performance. While there are enough evidences that certain types of HRM practices are associated with performance, the list of effective practices varies in each research. Practices typically mentioned in best practice models include:

a)    high levels of teamwork;

b)    performance-related pay;

c)     decentralised decision making;

d)    comprehensive employee recruitment and selection procedures;

e)     limited status differences;

f)     extensive training;

g)    employee involvement and internal communication arrangements;

h)    internal career opportunities; and

i)     Broadly defined job descriptions (Jones and Wright, 1992; Arthur, 1994; Pfeffer, 1994; Jackson and Schuler, 1995; MacDuffie, 1995; Marchinton, 1995; Milgrom and Roberts, 1995; Delery and Doty, 1996; Becker and Huselid, 1998; Pfeffer, 1998; Wiesner and McDonald, 2001; Bowen et al., 2002; Guest et al., 2003; Michie and Sheehan, 2005; de Kok et al., 2006).

Generally, best practice models emphasise three factors. Firstly, they usually put emphasis on enhancing employee abilities or knowledge and skills through effective recruitment and strong training. Secondly, best practice models contain an emphasis on motivating desired behaviour through strong incentives. Finally, best practice models promote opportunities for better trained and motivated workers to contribute to their Knowledge and skills through work redesign and indirect forms of employee participation (Boxal and Purcel, 2003).

 

Background of the Study

HR Practices: Importance in Improving Performance

Scientists express that foundations contrast in their targets in overseeing HR which depend on preferred worker attributes, perspectives, and PRCTICS and are gotten from HR system and hierarchical objectives. HR PRCTICS are seen as wide HR schedules and strategies that guarantee the genuine usage of HR arrangements. Besides, Boselie et al. (2009) distinguished an absence of HR study on different HR PRCTICS at the specific representative stage besides numerous stage investigations taking a gander on the effect of HR at workers as well as the amassed impacts on the association stage.

Wright, McCormack, Sherman and Mc-Mahan (1999, 552) in light of past investigation characterized HR PRCTICS as „the hierarchical exercises coordinated at dealing with the pool of human capital and guaranteeing that the capital is utilized towards the satisfaction of authoritative objectives". Besides, Wright et al. (1999) recommended that HR PRCTICS might be measured as means by which organizations may expand the aptitudes of the representatives as well as give motivations to organizations’ individuals in the direction of subsidise. In this regard, the information, skills and qualifications of specific members belonging to the associations are significant factors that influence the person other than the PERFMNC organization.

It is additionally significant, that Bowen and Ostroff (2004) characterized the HR procedure by way of impacting the lucidity of the signs that the PRCTICS direct to the representatives around wanted PRCTICS, while Ehrnrooth and Bjorkman (2012, 1110) received the accompanying expanded explanation. The "HR process" alludes to the conventional procedure characteristics of HR rehearses, (for example HR content) that sway on worker and hierarchical PERFMNC through their impact on representatives' comprehension of PERFMNC desires and on their capacity, opportunity, and inspiration to conform to these desires".

Past investigations in investigation PERFMNC territory absence of articles that depict the hypothetical structures as well as clarified by what means the examination subject is theorised as well as characterized. The point of this examination is in the direction of characterize HR works on upgrading investigation PERFMNC that will require the choice of specific HR PERFMNC, with regards to the hypothetical system. This work, which is a fictitious structure of this trial, is predicted by Appelbaum, Bailey, Berg, and Kalleberg (2000) and is based on the AMO hypothesis (skills, motivations and opportunities) established through Boselie, Dietz, and Boon (2005). Is based in a typical study that mitigates the impact of human resources on PERFMNC, a fictitious AMO structure dominates.

HR frameworks have been perceived as one probable methods through which associations may invigorate viable information PRCTICS (Chuang, Jackson, and Jiang, 2013). Be that as it may, in spite of various investigations breaking down HR PRCTICS impact on representative perspectives, conduct and efficiency, there has been next to no Examination analysing by what means HR frameworks impact investigation yield—specifically, analysts' profitability.

 

HR Practices Enhancing Investigation-Oriented Work

Association's all out HR framework normally includes numerous HR PRCTICS, yet not those PRCTICS are probably going to legitimately impact information improvement. To recognize PRCTICS that involve a HR framework for investigation upgrading exercises AMO method (Appelbaum et al., 2000) is embraced in the direction of recommend that HR frameworks for study focused work ought to incorporate capacity improving HR PRCTICS, inspiration improving HR PRCTICS, and opportunity-upgrading HR PRCTICS.

Paauwe and Boselie (2005, 73) announced the connections of Appelbaum et al. (2000) AMO-framework through (1) capability/aptitudes (e.g. official as well as casual coaching, learning), (2) inspiration/motivating forces (e.g. work safety, data allocation, interior advancement openings, reasonable instalment) and (3) chance to partake (e.g. self-sufficiency, group enrolment, correspondence). Investigating the particularities of investigation PERFMNC - all the more profoundly gifted occupations are relied upon to be inherently remunerated as chances to take an interest in considerable choices challenge labourers and expect them to be innovative and .utilize their aptitudes as well as information.

Past examinations on study PERFMNC distinguished the main specific elements improving investigation PERFMNC: inward capacity to direct investigation (inward inspiration) capacity to apportion time to investigate (White, James, Burke, and Allen, 2012), external (correspondence by professors as well as systems administration by global meetings. Outward inspiration is accepted to be less important for beneficial analysts than self-sufficiency and inward capacity to lead investigation. Examination frameworks are significant factors yet not adequate in upgrading investigation PERFMNC (Harris, 2008; Herdlein, Kukemelk, and Türk, 2008).

For example, HR PRCTICS help in the direction of oversee workers near singular PERFMNC besides satisfaction of authoritative objectives, HR works on improving exploration PERFMNC will be characterized by classes of HR PRCTICS.

 

Skill Enhancing HR Practices for Investigation Focused Work

The essential destinations (in light of Chuang et al., 2013) of expertise upgrading HR PRCTICS for study focused work are guaranteeing that people have and ceaselessly improve the information, aptitudes, and capacities expected to perform investigation focused work. Aptitude for upgrading HR PRCTICS are proposed to be committed to guarantee study improving factors, recently characterized as significant in invigorating analysts' efficiency. Considering enlistment works on employing newly stamped PhDs was recognized as significant factor in improving examination profitability. Also, Smeby and Try (2005) announced that extent of employees' with PhD's have noteworthy effect on study yield. Creating coaching to improve investigation exercises clearness recorded as a hard copy (writing in a way to explain and disentangle content contentions, Kiewra and Creswell, 2000), and propelled investigation aptitudes (being alright with insights, Study plan, information assortment strategies, and propelled techniques, Bland et al., 2005) is planned toward incorporate. Besides, capacity on the way to oversee period as well as commit adequate period toward investigation is measured by way of significant element of investigation efficiency and therefore important to guarantee through sufficient coaching (recorded as a hard copy, propelled study aptitudes and time the board) PRCTICS.

 

Motivation-Enhancing HR Practices for Investigation-Oriented Work

The essential goal (in view of Chuang et al., 2013) of inspiration upgrading HR PRCTICS is to drive consideration regarding investigation exercises, to persuade specialists to add to study exercises and afterward to actuate and improve people 'optional work.

Investigation in the zone of scholarly staff PERFMNC examination endorses the need to re-examine inspiration just as evaluation frameworks so as to build investigation profitability: the instalment by-PERFMNC framework and incitement of distribution of investigation works, money related motivators to spur higher investigation efficiency levels. Moreover, fulfilment with the advancements framework brings about higher investigation PERFMNCs and the other way around (Ramsden, 1994).

Studies in PERFMNC examination territory bolster the pertinence of the evaluation though both positive and negative viewpoints are noted. Moreover, consequences of past examinations show a need, aside from evaluation frameworks, to explore other basic parts of investigation PERFMNC upgrade (incitement). Harris (2008, 374) recommends that single of the objectives of empowering production is plausibility asses staff PERFMNC by a sort of target measure (contrasting with schooling and administration) and underscores that "a check of distributions is a piece of most personnel assessment frameworks, and a proportion of paper quality is regularly a piece of this estimation". Besides, Harris (1990) announced that amount, yet in addition quality, effect and significance are identified with study PERFMNC. Along these lines a significant job in the zone of investigation PERFMNC ought to be funded to the parts of investigation excellence to go in accordance with expanding quality necessities and setting HR PRCTICS concluded PERFMNC evaluation frameworks that improve distributing in highest papers.

Manning and Barrette (2005) proposed a technique for evaluation of investigation profitability and superiority with both measurable and subjective methodologies which was intended to increase the nature of investigation in managing colleges. True to form, results showed an expansion in the quantity of productions in significant equal (uppermost quality) papers. To animate investigation and impact a move from inferior worth papers to more elevated level papers, a fiscal honour driver was executed and a rundown of positioned papers was created. Moreover  Manning and Barrette (2005, 273) characterized that "distribution profitability is utilized as a target measure to mirror the position of the individual professors just as their establishments ".

 

Opportunity-Enhancing HR Practices for Investigation-Oriented Work

The essential goal (in light of Chuang et al., 2013) of prospect upgrading HR PRCTICS is to make fitting conditions for specialists who have the required capabilities and sufficient inspiration to participate in study arranged work. Social-correspondence is characterized as a fundamental factor in investigation improving exercises. In this way, a HR framework that gives chances to analysts to interface with others inside and outside an association may bolster and encourage study PERFMNC. Fox (1983) examined the writing on associates and elements of distribution profitability and detailed that mental factor "self-course" is significant element of the most gainful investigators. Independence was distinguished in past examinations as a significant indicator of superior. Bland et al. (2005, 228) revealed discoveries of one clinical school and established that a person's exploration efficiency is impacted via independence and duty which were portrayed as having "scholarly opportunity, arranging one's own time and defining one's own objectives, but at the same time being focused on and assuming a significant job inside the bigger association". Wood (1990) revealed the outcomes from one Australian college and showed that self-governance in choosing investigation themes is fundamental in investigation PERFMNC. Accordingly, self-sufficiency in study plan is significant and must be guaranteed.

Halilem, Amara, and Landry (2013) portrayed a critical move in the method for leading exploration, as of individual centred effort to an association of work in groups of investigators and gave a framework of investigation group PERFMNC and adequacy. Fox and Mohapatra (2007) revealed that PERFMNC is identified with expert’s effort gatherings and demonstrated group creation factors of sexual orientation of staff members together in association to distribution efficiency and reasoned that "the key variable is the cooperation among being a male personnel defendant and having higher quantities of male alumni learners in the group" (p.560). As test included doctoral conceding dept. of software engineering, science, EE, microbiology, and material science, additional investigation on sociologies ought to be established too. In this way provision of collaboration is vital assessing opportunity-upgrading PRCTICS.

Correspondence and systems administration of specialists are recognized by past investigations as critical elements of investigation efficiency. Outside correspondence is endorsed to be the key condition for elevated level investigation efficiency. Kiewra and Creswell (2000) stressed the significance of powerful joint effort with capable learner in distributing articles. Most of past investigation distinguished correspondence outside organization as significant connect of profitable analyst: cooperation regularly on scholastic issues with outside associates, organizing through universal gatherings sharing thoughts at proficient gatherings and in distributions (Harris, 2008), correspondence with outer expert system. Besides, the quantity of investigation ventures embraced, at the same time, was distinguished a significant element of work PRCTICS in establishing investigation PRCTICS. Satisfactory HR PRCTICS must be intended to engage representatives to utilize their abilities and inspiration to accomplish study arranged objectives. In this way, association in ventures, provision of work in groups, consolation to convey, particularly outside foundation and team up with skilled PhD learners, and satisfactory self-sufficiency in investigation plan must be guaranteed to improve study arranged work.

It is additionally important, that elements of investigation PERFMNC calculating have been broke down in various examination fields and nations. For example, an investigation of investigation movement in business organization concentrates in the UK discovered objects in arbitrated scholastic papers, as proportion of investigation yield. A lot of studies have been directed in Australia that investigated: proportions of investigation yield of Australian financial aspects divisions and development of publications measures positioning Australian resources by the quantity of arbitrated objects (yield) and dependent on it characterization of resources of one order zone (business) into sets that display comparative measures.  As of late, Bacon, Paul, Steward and Mukhopadhyay (2012) proposed another apparatus for target investigation PERFMNC assessment that joined journal quality, amount, and writer commitment to frame decisions of a specialist’s presentation and tried it with advertising personnel at a college in the US. In addition, Ying and Sung (2000) in their exploration additionally thought about agreements, licenses and prizes as additional yield things and ordered staff associated with investigation exercises into analysts and investigation – supporting staff. In this manner standard investigation yields (that are characterized as the most noteworthy pointers of scholarly staff efficiency) are: journal articles, books and distributed authority reports, logical journal quality and writer commitment.

 

Conclusions

In spite of plenty of investigations on HR-PERFMNC connection, there is as yet an absence of studies, devoted to improvement of investigation PERFMNC through HR PRCTICS. While investigation, quality is the fundamental test for European foundations of advanced learning, for as long as quite a while. To recognize study improving HR PRCTICS, key individual variables of gainful scientists were distinguished and the (AMO) approach was received. Therefore expertise upgrading, inspiration improving and opportunity-upgrading HR PRCTICS for study focused on effort were uncovered: ability improving (enlistment of newly printed PhDs; preparing recorded as a hard copy, propelled study aptitudes and time management), inspiration improving (scholarly staff evaluation with both quantitative and subjective methodologies) and opportunity-upgrading (contribution in ventures; provision of work in groups; support to team up with skilled PhD learners and to impart outside organization; and sufficient self-rule in explore motivation). This recognizable proof gives hypothetical response to the inquiry in what way to animate investigation action among specialists and what successful HR PRCTICS to actualize to arrive at hierarchical objectives. Moreover, management of colleges may consolidate sufficient institutional arrangements to oversee scholarly staff viably applying explicit HR PRCTICS for study focused work.


 


Appelbaum, E. and Batt, R. (1994), The New American Workplace, ILR Press, New York, NY.

Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. and Kalleberg, A.L. (2000), Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off, Cornell University Press, London.

Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., % Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca,NY: Cornell University Press.

Bacon, D.R., Paul, P., Stewart, K.A., % Mukhopadhyay, K. (2012, August). A new tool for identifying research standards and evaluating research performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 34, 194-208.

Bland, C.J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D.A., K.R. Risbey % Staples, J.G. (2005, March). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80, 225-237.

Boselie, P., Brewster, C., % Paauwe, J. (2009). In search of balance - Managing the dualities of HRM: An overview of the issues. Personnel Review, 38, 461-471.

Boselie, P., Dietz, G., % Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15, 67-94.

Bowen, D. E. % Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of the "strength" of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203-21.

Chuang, C., Jackson, S. E., % Jiang, Y. (2013). Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership, and tacit knowledge". Journal of Management, doi: 10.1177/0149206313478189

Delaney, J.T. and Huselid, M.A. (1996), "The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 949-69.

Ehrnrooth, M., % Bjorkman, I. (2012). An integrative HRM process theorization: beyond signalling effects and mutual gains. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1109-35.

Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.

Fox, M. F., % Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education, 78, 543-571.

Frits, K. and MacDuffie, P. (1996), "The adoption of high-involvement work practices",Industrial Relations, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 423-55.

Guest, D.E. (1997), "Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda", International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 263-76.

Guest, D.E., Michie, J., Conway, N. and Sheeman, M. (2003), "Human resource management and corporate performance in UK", British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 291-314.Parliament.

Halilem, N., Amara, N. % Landry, R. (2013). Team performance and efficiency, toward a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business Strategy, 13, 73-92

Harris, C. (2008, July). Ranking the Management Journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39, 373-409.

Harris, G. T. (1990). Research output in Australian university economics departments: An update for 1984-88. Australian Economic Papers, 29, 249.

Herdlein, R., Kukemelk, H., % Türk, K. (2008, November). A survey of academic officers regarding performance appraisal in Estonian and American universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30, 387- 399.

Hoque, K. (1999), "Human resource management and performance in the UK hotel industry", British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 419-43.

Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance.Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.

Huselid, M.A. (1995), "The impact of human resource management practices on turnover,productivity, and corporate financial performance", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 635-72.

Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T., Levine, D., Olson, C. and Strauss, G. (1996), "What works at work: overview and assessment", Industrial Relations, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 299-333.

Kiewra, K. A., % Creswell, J. W. (2000). Conversations with three highly productive educational psychologists: Richard Anderson, Richard Mayer, and Michael Pressley. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 135-161.

MacDuffie, J.P. (1995), "Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry", Industrial % Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 197-221.

Manning, L. M., % Barrette, J. (2005). Research performance management in academe.Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 22, 273-287.

Michie, J. and Sheehan, M. (2001), "Labour market flexibility, human resource management and corporate performance", British Journal of Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 287-306.

Paauwe, J., % Boselie, P. (2005). HRM and performance: What next? Human Resource Management Journal, 15, 68-83.

Pfeffer, J. (1994), Competitive Advantage through People, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.

Ramsden, P. (1994) Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28, 207-226.

Smeby, J., % Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education, 46, 593-619

Tabiu, A.% Nura, A.A. (2013). Assessing the effects of human resource management (HRM) practices on employee job performance: a study of Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5, 247-259.

Weigmans, B., and Konings, R. (2015). Intermodal Inland Waterway Transport: Modelling Conditions Infl uencing Its Cost Competitiveness, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31(2), 273-294.

White, C. S., James, K., Burke, L. A., % Allen, R. S. (2012). What makes a "research star"? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 584- 602.

Wood, F. (1990). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Education, 19, 81-100.

Wood, S. (1996), "High commitment management and payment systems", Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 53-77.

Wright, P. M., McCormack, B., Sherman, W. S., % Mc-Mahan, G. G. (1999). The role of human resource practices in petro-chemical refinery performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10, 551-571.

Ying, C. N., % Sung Ko, L. (2000). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher educations: An application. Education Economics, 8, 139-156.


Follow Us